Every suspicious order, fake signup, or noisy traffic spike pulls time from ops and support. Even when the team catches the problem, the cost has already started to accumulate.
Manual review is not free protection. It is labor cost created by earlier signals the store failed to handle upstream.
+233%
retail e-commerce chargeback-rate increase in Sift's 2025 data
22.6%
bot-related share of support volume in Securify internal business-case evidence
21
refund requests tied to bot-related pain in internal business-case evidence
Earlier control. Clearer signals. Less downstream mess.
Filter suspicious traffic earlier so fewer bad cases reach manual handling.
Give operators clearer controls and risk context when they do need to intervene.
Reduce repeated review work caused by preventable traffic noise.
No. Some cases still need human judgment. The point is to shrink the avoidable workload, not pretend there will never be edge cases.
Because many merchants feel the cost operationally before they have the language to describe it. This page connects that pain to a clearer control strategy.
No. Smaller teams feel review burden even more sharply because every hour spent on abuse is an hour not spent on customers or growth.
Free on every plan · no credit card · about 2 minutes
Chargebacks
Why the dispute is only the visible part of the cost, and why earlier traffic controls matter.
Read guideBots and VPNs
Operational guide for merchants seeing suspicious visitors, VPN traffic, scraping, and blocking failures.
Read guidePeak season
How BFCM, campaigns, and promo spikes compress response time and make bad traffic more expensive.
Read guide